Koehl uses sarcasm in his first paragraph to trigger a new thought into the reader's minds. He claims, "Everyone should have a Sub Urban Vanity… the ads all say we need one." This sarcastic tone is clear and brings up an argument for the readers. It is obvious that an SUV is not for everyone and Koehl probably knows that, but he is likely trying to get people to make the argument for themselves. His clever introduction probably has many people sub-consciously on his side. Most readers probably realize that he is using sarcasm but he has put the thought that SUV's aren't for everyone into the people's minds.
Koehl also attempts to scare his audience by saying that children are at risk with the massive carbon dioxide that is being released into the atmosphere by SUV's. He says, "Give your children a secure environment—an extended warranty cabin where they can drink chilled beverages while they figure out how to cope with the extra carbon dioxide you pump into the atmosphere on their behalf." Koehl uses children as a target because many people feel a need to protect their kids. He wants people to think that because they are driving an SUV they are creating a hazard to their children and if they don't stop, something bad will happen. This passage hopes to scare readers into an emotional reaction in Koehl's favor. He hopes his readers will realize the threat their car is having on the environment and stop driving their SUV immediately. Koehl also tries to scare his readers in this passage by using the word "cope". This word is normally used to describe someone who is overcoming a terrible experience and has to deal with the associated pain and agony. By using this word, Koehl exaggerates the threat, hoping to get people to act, and quickly.
Lake Powell's impact on the enviroment and visa veras
3 comments:
becca,
intro is a little too long. by just using a couple examples, you can get your point accross, but dont do too many. thesis needs to be more specific: SUV's are an [environmental] problem.
first para.. go a little more in depth about the reasoning behind the sarcasm there. yes, he's trying to put the reader on his side, but does he make a good point, does he make the reader remember that sentence? and rearrange the sentences, put the sarcasm first, and then do the more detailed analysis.
second para = great job!
I think you did a good job with this. You did a good job analyzing the article. I like the idea for the issues paper too. People love Lake Powell and so people will enjoy reading it.
yeah lake powell rock's . remember to analyze a little bit more
Post a Comment